On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:29:54 +0200, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That was talk about c-ares as replacement for adns. It came out on top of > my > preference list (further candidates: UDNS and posadis). I have had no time > to > investigate this any further, let alone start design/implementation.
It looks like the c-ares community reacted pretty quickly to the DNS poisoning flaw discovered recently (http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/mail/c-ares-archive-2008-07/) while the ADNS community hasn't (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MIMG-7ECL5U). This is probably a good hint that we should switch. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
