My vote goes to 1. -martin
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:12 AM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] performing cpu/time intensive computation in aprotocol dissector On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Sake Blok wrote: > > You could leave the code in there, and have an 'identify weak keys' > > menu option. > > > > But at present I'm changing my vote to 1) Don't include the code at all. > > All considering, I vote for 1) as well. I still strongly prefer 2) (optionally identify) ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
