Hi Paul, That's great. Please try to get some captures through the fuzztester as well.
Thanx, Jaap Paul Dietrich wrote: > Jaap, > > Thanks. I will build and test. We've got access to many LLRP devices > for testing. > > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:17 PM > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support > > Hi, > > What you could do is compile your own Wireshark version with this patch > included > and test the hell out of it. ;) > It's 216 kB of source code to review, I'm not sure if anyone can > allocate his > spare time on it on short notice. > > Thanx, > Jaap > > Paul Dietrich wrote: >> Me too! I can't wait to have this in the production wireshark. Right >> now we are relying on a protocol dissector at >> http://www.llrp.org/tools/decode.html which is very tedious compared > to >> wireshark. Is there something I can do to help? >> >> Regards >> >> Paul >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Poduska >> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:26 AM >> To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark' >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] LLRP dissector support >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm just curious if anyone on the Wireshark development team has had a >> chance to review this dissector recently. I'm interested to know if >> there is >> anything else I should do to bring it into code compliance. >> >> Thanks, Matt Poduska >> _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
