Hi,

When what happens? Probably the buildbots are going to be oke, but is that 
enough. Is that equal to "every single current and historical system variant".
I guess not. So I think we have to look harder before we start.

Thanx,
Jaap

Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Why not check in a subset of the changes and see what happens, if
> there's a problem we can easily roll back.
> Regards
> Anders 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
> Sent: den 17 oktober 2008 07:33
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] stdio.h/stdlib.h includes apparently not
> req'd in epan/dissector source files ....
> 
> Bill Meier wrote:
>> Just for the record: My original reply to John follows (which I 
>> mistakenly sent only to John).
>>
>>
>> John Sullivan wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Random *local* include files I would whole heartedly agree, but not
> 
>>> system ones unless you have tested on every single current and  > 
>> historical system variant.
>>
>>
>> Certainly a valid point.....
>>
>> I'll hold off for now.
>>
>> Interestingly enough, I do note that just about half of the 
>> epan/dissector .c source files do not include stdio.h (and more than 
>> half do not include stdlib.h) and I've not heard of any issues with 
>> NULL & etc (although I don't know if anyone has built Wireshark with
> GCC 4.3).
>> Bill
> Hi,
> 
>  From About Wireshark: "Built using gcc 4.3.1.", as every Debian/Testing
> installation has. So that shouldn't be a problem. Maybe it's 4.3.0
> specific.
> 
> Thanx,
> Jaap

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to