On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote: > How does this compare to LUA?
1) it works even if Wireshark isn't built with Lua 2) more importantly, it's a *descriptive* language, not an *imperative* language - you don't write code to dissect the packet, you write a description of what the packets look like, so presumably it's easier to write and harder to get wrong. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
