Hi,

You may have a point there. Would you open a bug for that in the Wireshark bug 
database (https://bugs.wireshark.org)? That way it won't be forgotten.

Thanx,
Jaap

Michael Lum wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> (Source is from 1.0.4)
> 
> I was looking through tap-rtp-common.c because I wanted
> to add some CODECs when I noticed what I think is a bug.
> 
> In this function:
> 
> static guint32
> get_dyn_pt_clock_rate(gchar *payload_type_str)
> {
>     size_t i;
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < NUM_DYN_CLOCK_VALUES; i++) {
>         if
> (g_ascii_strncasecmp(mimetype_and_clock_map[i].pt_mime_name_str,payload_
> type_str,(strlen(mimetype_and_clock_map[i].pt_mime_name_str))) == 0)
>             return mimetype_and_clock_map[i].value;
>     }
> 
>     return 1;
> }
> 
> Here's the first 2 entries in the array:
> 
> static const mimetype_and_clock mimetype_and_clock_map[] = {
>         {"AMR",         8000},                  /* [RFC3267] */
>         {"AMR-WB",      16000},                 /* [RFC3267] */
> 
> So if 'payload_type_str' is equal to 'AMR-WB' I believe the first match
> will be 'AMR' and the
> returned clock rate of 8000 will be incorrect.
> 
> Wouldn't my example be the equivalent to
> 
>       strncasecmp("AMR", "AMR-WB", 3)
> 
> ?
> 
> Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to