I thought I had better follow up on this. After privately consulting with
Luis, I have worked out what has gone wrong. I took the sample code and
tried to run it outside of init.lua using a function that was registered
with the menu (using register_menu() ).

It turns out the fields must be created before init.lua finishes. You can
register new protocols and dissectors at run time (as I did with the menu
function), but not fields.

Regards, Martin

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Martin Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am just playing with the chained postdissector example in
> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Lua/Dissectors
>
> It correctly registers the "http_extra" protocol, and the chaining works in
> that I get the extra analysis being done and the spiffy new text at the
> bottom of the packet details. However the fields http.newfield1 and
> http.newfield2 do not seem to be registered. The comment in the example code
> indicates it should appear in the expression list, but they don't , and I
> can't use the display filter "http.newfield1 ==42" - it stays red, hence I
> am confident it isn't being registered. The lua code doesn't bomb out (as
> the other stuff works), so I am wondering whether something has been broken
> since the supposed 0.99.7 that it has been tested on (i'm currently on 1.0.4
> in Windows.
>
> (BTW I changed the line "if f_set_cookie() then" to just "if 1 then" to
> exercise it on every http packet.)
>
> --
> Regards, Martin
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to