Hello, everyboday:
Is there anybody have interesting to merge TUP protocol to wireshark?
I want to do this work. What's you opinion?
Best Regards!

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Send Wireshark-dev mailing list submissions to
>        wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 26904:        /trunk/plugins/unistim/
>      /trunk/plugins/unistim/: packet-unistim.c (Joerg Mayer)
>   2. Building Wireshark - Using nmake (philippe alarcon)
>   3. Re: Building Wireshark - Using nmake (Graham Bloice)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:31:57 +0100
> From: Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26904:
>        /trunk/plugins/unistim/ /trunk/plugins/unistim/: packet-unistim.c
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> > Care to comment on this one?
> > Frankly I'm getting tired of going back and forth with this thing.
> > Can't we sort it out once and for all?
>
> The only comment I can give is, that in current svn head using port 5000
> for Unistim still eats TAPA packets.
> I've changed it back to the old comment and port 0
>
>  ciao
>     Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:26:58 +0100
> From: philippe alarcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Building Wireshark - Using nmake
> To: <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build the application under Windows XP.
>
> In order to see if my environment is correct,
> I have tried to build WSUTIL module.
>
> I have used the basic command : nmake -f Makefile.nmake
>
> My problem is that the make file doesn't find win32.mak.
>
> I have not found this file.
>
> Could somebody help me ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Regards
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> In?dit ! Des Emotic?nes D?jant?es! Installez les dans votre Messenger !
> http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/Emoticones/EmoticonesDejantees.aspx
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081204/0b53e2f4/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:42:37 +0000
> From: Graham Bloice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Building Wireshark - Using nmake
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> philippe alarcon wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build the application under Windows XP.
> >
> > In order to see if my environment is correct,
> > I have tried to build WSUTIL module.
> >
> > I have used the basic command : nmake -f Makefile.nmake
> >
> > My problem is that the make file doesn't find win32.mak.
> >
> > I have not found this file.
> >
> > Could somebody help me ?
> Have you followed the developers guide for setting up your windows dev
> environment?
> (http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html).
>
> In particular, step 2.2.6.  I'm guessing that your path isn't good.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Graham Bloice
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081204/28ab7305/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
> End of Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 31, Issue 8
> ********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to