On Dec 18, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Martin Mathieson wrote: > Sorry about that, I didn't grep to see if it was being called. > Because it compiled OK I wrongly assumed it wasn't.
BTW, as it's an add_bytes routine, presumably it should take a const guint8 * pointing to the sequence of bytes to be added, the way proto_tree_add_bytes() and proto_tree_add_bytes_format_value() do. Why was the start_ptr argument removed? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
