On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:33:26PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I have checked in a fix in revision 2731, formally I think the frame > >> is wrongly Encoded as the tag [3] is missing but from comments in the > >> code It looks like this is common
[...] cristian: is there a way that ws shows some warning that: - the actual encoding is broken (i.e. not standard, in our case UNIVERSAL tag is used instead of the CONTEXT one which is forced by the definition) - it is (heuristically) trying to decode the message anyway? thanks a lot! bye now! cristian ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
