Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > When converting the clist in rtp_analysis.c to a gtk_list_store it > turned out that to get acceptable performance functions from GTK+ 2.6 > was needed. > > As Stephen Fisher pointed out: > > > My initial fix to the problem Anders brought up requires GTK+ 2.6 or > later (it is wrapped in a GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0)). > > > Right now, we have nineteen GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0) checks in the > code. GTK+ 2.6.0 is dated Dec 16 2004 on _ftp.gtk.org_ > <file://ftp.gtk.org>. > > > I think it's reasonable to expect a GTK newer than 5+ years old.
[...] > So I realy think that we sould go for a more modern GTK+ version with > Wireshark 1.2 ( Minimum 2.6), from above 2.12 might be the right choice. > On Windows we are using GTK+ 2.14. A while ago I would have argued to keep support for GTK 2.4 because that's what ships with Solaris 10 which is a) likely to be around for a while and b) Sun doesn't update it the way Linux distributions do, but I've been having unpleasant enough experiences with that version (just GUI quirks/weirdness when using Wireshark) I no longer think keeping support for 2.4 is such a good thing. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
