Hi Michael, I don't see a problem with these options. Since this is a somewhat 'internal' interface (only powerusers are likely to use it directly) I think this has to be as versatile as possible.
Thanx, Jaap Sent from my iPhone On 6 mei 2009, at 10:46, Michael Tüxen <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm implementing the support of simultaniously > capturing from multiple interfaces in dumpcap. > The first step, the support of writing in pcapng is done. > > Now I need to be able to specify multiple interfaces > on the command line and also provide interface > specific options. I think something like > > dumpcap -n -i lo0 -f udp -s 100 -y whatever -i en0 -s 0 -f sctp - y > whatever > > should be possible. So I would like to require that you > need to specify the -i options before -f, -s, and -y. > The values specified by -f, -s, and -y only apply to > the interface specified before using the -i option. > It is also required to specify -n for using pcapng. > > What do you think? Is this acceptable? > > Or would you prefer to have only one capture filter > and snap length for all interfaces? Having the same > link-type makes no sense. > > I also would like to have either > one pipe > or a single or multiple interfaces. > But I think that is not a problem. > > Best regards > Michael > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
