On 6 jun 2009, at 01:29, didier <[email protected]> wrote:

> Le samedi 06 juin 2009 à 00:26 +0200, Sake Blok a écrit :
>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:55:02PM +0200, didier wrote:
>>> Le dimanche 31 mai 2009 à 11:56 +0200, Sake Blok a écrit :
>>>> Hi Jaap (& list),
>>>>
>>>> As the "father" of the "copy as filter" functionality, I would  
>>>> vote for it
>>>> to be present all the time in the packet details pane (where I  
>>>> use it most).
>>>> Keeping track of all possible filters for the packet list pane  
>>>> seems like an
>>>> overkill to me and could be made optional to save memory. Or it  
>>>> should be
>>>> implemented in a way where it will dynamically be generated. For  
>>>> 1.2.0 I
>>>> would suggest to just revert the implemented memory-consuming  
>>>> patch and
>>>> disable the functionality in the packet-list. Then we can decide  
>>>> later to
>>>> make it either optional of write code that dynamically generate  
>>>> the filter
>>>> string on use (if that is at all possible).
>>>
>>> Anyone remember why it was changed from dynamically generate?
>>> The SVN log msg doesn't make sense to me.
>>
>> IIRC, the filter strings were not generated dynamically, they were
>> generated while building the packet-list, resulting in having the
>> filters for the last row to be the filters for all rows. But my  
>> memory
>> might not be totally accurate ;-)
> It was generated, cf svn  24511 but:
> 1- didn't work with col_custom
> 2- use ep_alloc, a bit dangerous?

... Then it was destroyed in rev 24595, while trying to fix bug 2343.  
Then the feature was repaired in rev 27396, but with bug 3489 for  
GTK1, which is now repaired too.

>
> attached a modified version which work for me.
>
> Didier
>
> <main.diff>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to