On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:41 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:

> Now you're telling me that file name in question is not 100% correct  
> so
> you're changing it back into the chaos we once had - ignoring the
> benefits we could get from the name prefixes.f

I'm unconvinced that, for that *particular* file, there's any benefit  
whatsoever to having main_ in the name at all.  It should be pretty  
obvious that a file with "menus" in its name would contain the  
implementation of menus.

> They also appear in the "show packet in a new window" which is  
> basically
> a kind of "mirror" of the main window.

I do not consider that to be sufficient reason to attach the word  
"main" to the code that implements the protocol tree or hex dump pane;  
I think of those windows as "packet window"s rather than just as  
mirrors of the main window.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to