Hello Gerald,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:28:57AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29005
>
> User: gerald
> Date: 2009/07/07 05:28 PM
>
> Log:
> Fix several dissector assertions.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
> Changes Path Action
> +25 -20 packet-glbp.c Modified
The idea of doing that lastoffset = offset ... stuff was, that I am reverse
engineering the protocol and I wanted to be able to safely resume dissection
if one element was not of the format that I expected it to have, e.g. have
some trailing information. Was there a specific reason to remove that
behaviour?
Thanks
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
