Hi,
instead of binpac, and since you're doing python, would it be useful to to > use > pyconstruct > http://pyconstruct.wikispaces.com/ > as a (simplified) protocol fields "Description Language"? > I did not know about pyconstruct. Worth take a look at it. ;) > That way pythoners can reuse their pyconstruct code directly in Wireshark? > same as for binpac, could be useful for the ones who already wrote dissectors with it. So, it might be interesting to have both of them available for wireshark. I don't know tough what sort of limits (or not) pyconstruct could have. Regards, Sebastien Tandel > On May 30, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Sébastien Tandel wrote: > > P.S. : I would like to add binpac within this python interpreter. > > But after having read the paper and thought a bit about the grammar, > > I think they've used Haskell (or another pure functional language > > for their compiler). > > ------------------------------ > Create a cool, new character for your Windows Live™ Messenger. Check it > out <http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9656621> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
