Hi, On 24 jul 2009, at 11:33, Ulf Lamping <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jaap Keuter schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> What's wrong with 1.2.1? > > Hi! > > AFAIK, e.g. the following PROFINET stuff that is not part of it: > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=29150 > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=28932 > I haven't checked, but I'm sure they are not if you say so. > And as they are not bugfixes but extensions, they shouldn't be > backported to the release branch? That is correct as well. > Last time I heard about it, the idea was to have a development version > every few months (1.1.3 is from march) to make "experimental stuff" > available to the public. Indeed, but is there enough already to do that after only a single month after release. > Just what I asked for ;-) I was under the impression you replaced the profinet one by your own for internal use. That wouldn't need a development release. Now it's clear you need the open source version, so indeed a development release would do the trick. Thanks for clearing that up. > Regards, ULFL Thanx, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
