[email protected] wrote: > don't give up, as we'll just skip the bad item and move on to > the next item. >
The dissector "skips to the next" using the bad tag length so I thought it better to not try to keep on dissecting. Would using the expected length to skip to the next be an appropriate alternative ?? (Can't say I really like that either ....) Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
