Hey Anders, Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > We only need the max strlen don't we? > E.g no need to store the length per frame? >
Initially I thought about doing it as you suggests but this has some drawbacks: 1) We can't handle asynchronous name resolution. There might be cases where the column string actually shrinks due to name resolution. 2) It won't work if the user is using a display filter. If the user is 'display filtering' we never interact with the packet list store (we simply toggle the 'dfilter_passed' bit in 'frame_data') so we can't update the 'largest value' in the packet list store. Based on this I opted for the current solution. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
