On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Brad Guillory wrote: > I am willing to try to write a decoder if that is what it takes; but > I hope that there is an easier solution.
There's an "easier" solution, in the sense of "less work to do on the code", but you'll still have to recompile Wireshark; see my response to your earlier mail. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
