Thanks Steve,

the CDP dissector looks very promising, but I am still open for other 
suggestion ;)
Will try to find a cdp trace with a bit more information than in the ones 
uploaded to the wireshark wiki.


Jan

On 18.12.2009, at 10:56, Stephen Fisher wrote:

> 
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:11 AM, Jan Gerbecks wrote:
> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> | FieldID 8bit       | Length 16 bit | Data as specified in FieldId and  
>> described by length  | FieldID | Length | Data|---           |
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This looks just like the common Type-Length-Value (TLV) format 
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type-length-value 
> ) used in protocols such as Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) and many  
> others.  Unfortunately, Wireshark does not have built-in routines for  
> easily handling TLV data right now.  Try looking at how the CDP  
> dissector handles it (epan/dissectors/packet-cdp.c).  Maybe others can  
> suggest a better example dissector.
> 
>> To dissect this correctly, I could obviously try to define the  
>> maximum number of PNRP Ids in the hf_register_info hf[] Array but  
>> that doesn't seem like a very elegant solution.
> 
>> I had a look at the vnc dissector but it didn't quite solved the  
>> same problem.
> 
> Yeah.. As the writer of a lot of the VNC dissector, I would say that  
> it's probably not a good example as the total length of the nested  
> messages in VNC usually isn't known at the beginning of the message,  
> so it's kind of a hack to get it to work at all :).
> 
> 
> Steve
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
> 

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to