Hi Bill, Yes, FOP 0.95 tries to do a better job, but if you look at the details:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/graphics.html#png -------8<------- PNG PNG images are supported through an Image I/O codec. Transparency is supported but not guaranteed to work with every output format. -------8<------- And that means: -------8<------- Image I/O The image loading framework in XML Graphics Commons provides a wrapper to load images through the JDK's Image I/O API (JSR 015). Image I/O allows to dynamically add additional image codecs. An example of such an add-on library are the JAI Image I/O Tools available from Sun. -------8<------- So you still need JAI or jimi to do the actual work. Without it, no graphics in your PDF's Thanks, Jaap Bill Meier wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Update readme information, ... >> > > Re: the changes to remove the "for fop 0.20.5 only" notes > > such as: > > -JIMI (for PDF generation with fop 0.20.5 only) > +JIMI (for PDF generation) > > > My understanding is that 0.95 doesn't require JIMI & etc. > Is there something special about the Wireshark docbook stuff that does > require JIMI when using FOP 0.95 (or am I missing something) ?? > > > From: the FOP 0.95 release notes: > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/releaseNotes_0.95.html > > "... > The image libraries Jimi and JAI are no longer needed (and used) for > image loading. Instead we rely completely on the Image I/O API that has > been introduced with Java 1.4. If you still need support for bitmap > image formats that do not work out-of-the-box, we recommend adding JAI > Image I/O Tools (an Image I/O compatible image codec package) to the > classpath. ...." > > Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
