Hi, I took the GIMP, loaded the graphic, selected 'Scale image' and adjusted the resolution to a more appropriate value. A production run of the PDFs verified the result.
Thanks, Jaap Martin Mathieson wrote: > Hi Jaap, > > Could you please describe how you did this? > Is it documented somewhere? > > Martin > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:09 PM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=31834 > <http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=31834> > > User: jake > Date: 2010/02/08 02:09 PM > > Log: > Rightsize graphics by modifying their DPI. > > Directory: /trunk/docbook/wsug_graphics/ > Changes Path Action > +0 -0 ws-gui-config-profiles.png Modified > +0 -0 ws-menu.png Modified > +0 -0 ws-statistics-menu.png Modified > +0 -0 ws-stats-lte-rlc-traffic.png Modified > +0 -0 ws-tel-rtpstream-analysis.png Modified > +0 -0 ws-telephony-menu.png Modified > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
![Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 31834: /trunk/docbook/wsug_graphics/ /trunk/docbook/wsug_graphics/: ws-gui-config-profiles.png ws-menu.png ws-statistics-menu.png ws-stats-lte-rlc-traffic.png ...](/search?l=wireshark-dev@wireshark.org&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BWireshark%5C-dev%5C%5D+%5C%5BWireshark%5C-commits%5C%5D+rev+31834%5C%3A%09%5C%2Ftrunk%5C%2Fdocbook%5C%2Fwsug_graphics%5C%2F+%5C%2Ftrunk%5C%2Fdocbook%5C%2Fwsug_graphics%5C%2F%5C%3A%09ws%5C-gui%5C-config%5C-profiles.png+ws%5C-menu.png+ws%5C-statistics%5C-menu.png+ws%5C-stats%5C-lte%5C-rlc%5C-traffic.png+...%22&o=newest){kind=link}
