On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Jaap Keuter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Better file an enhancement bug, so it won't get lost. > > Thanks, > Jaap > Sure. The idea was to get some feedback first, but OK: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4550 Y. > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:32:24 +0200, Kaul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Attached non-elegant patch shows, in addition to the already shown total > > number of bytes, the number of segments that were used to desegment a > > message. > > It may not be very efficient (and I'm open to suggestions on how to > > enhance it) but it works. > > > > diff against SVN r32082. > > > > TIA, > > Y. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
