Craig Bumpstead wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the quick response. That setting is off. > The first and second packets are TCP port 4435 and 21016 which it decodes. > However from that point on it doesn't decode packets with > TCP port 4435. > > I loath posting my code, but obviously I am making a mistake somewhere. >
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the code. A question: What is actually shown in Wireshark for the packets not decoded ? Are they decoded as TCP ? As some other protocol ? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
