Bill Meier wrote: > Kaul wrote: >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Anders Broman >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Note that packet-kerberos-template.c isn't used to generate >>> packet-kerberos.c currently, I would guess >>> that the info in packet-kerberos-template.c is copied from the current hand >>> written dissector. >>> Regards >>> Anders >>> >> >> Yes, I've just discovered that. And indeed, changing the value in >> packet-kerberos.c seems to solve the issue. >> Y. >> >> > > When I looked at this some time back, I convinced myself (ISTR via > testing) that the 'dissect_ber_integer' in 'dissect_krb5_PA_DATA_type' > returned a 32-bit 'FFFFFF80' for a KRB5_PA_PAC_REQUEST byte of 0x80. > > The same appeared to also be true for KRB5_PA_S4U2SELF & > KRB5_PA_PROV_SRV_LOCATION. > > > Can you supply a capture so I can look into this ??? > > (Maybe the best way is to create a bug report and attach a capture file. > You can mark the attachment as private if needed). > > Thanks > > Bill > > >
PS: remembering a bit more: This was my attempt to fix bug #4363. Suggestions are welcome as to a better fix .... ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
