Kaul wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Stephen Fisher > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:57:51PM +0300, Kaul wrote: >> >>> I've ran clang static analyser on SVN latest and got the following: >>> Obviously, there's little chance I can fix all of them. I can try fix >>> a few from the dissectors I'm familiar with, though.
> > > Oy Vey! I've just built clang from SVN and now it finds 3354 bugs. > Regretfully, its report is not file based - it just shows them one after > another, not sorted by file. > I'm not even sure how to open a bug on so many files, and it would be quite > difficult go through each file and report the bug. The report ( 6 HTMLs, > uncompressed) is 1.8MB - should I perhaps zip and file a single bug? > I'm almost done with the fixes to packet-ssl.c, but there are so many > others... > Y. > > I did a build using clang a while back and came to the conclusion that I would focus what appeared to be real problems (null-pointer deref, etc) as for me "life was too short" to try to fix all the dead code & etc. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
