Hi, Certainly a UAT looks very sensible. I wasn't familiar with them until you pointed them out. I'll have a look.
Graeme 2010/6/23 Stig Bjørlykke <[email protected]> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Log: > > Configuration to allow the definition of an OID name and associated > syntax. > > Great news! I have been thinking about this for a long time. > > > The configuration file is a glib key-value file, with the dotted OID > used as > > the group, and two keys defined, "name" and "syntax". > > What about using a UAT for entering this values? Then we can have a > drop-down with valid syntax values, and we have more control over the > input. > > > -- > Stig Bjørlykke > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
