On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:07 AM, eymanm wrote:
> Is there a way to such thing?
Unfortunately, no. Somebody else asked about the same general idea recently:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201007/msg00007.html
(although as "FIELDNAME[n]" rather than "FIELDNAMEn") and my followups refer to
other threads about this in the past, dating back to, at least, 2006.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
