Jeff Morriss wrote: > Gerald Combs wrote: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=33464 >>> >>> User: morriss >>> Date: 2010/07/07 08:52 AM >>> >>> Log: >>> Fix infinite recursion reported in >>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4984 : In >>> try_get_ber_length() make sure we move forward before recursing. >>> >>> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ >>> Changes Path Action >>> +57 -56 packet-ber.c Modified >> If I apply the attached debugging code to packet-ber.c I see some high >> stack counts in the fuzz capture from bug 4984. It looks like we're >> still vulnerable to a stack overflow. > > Interesting--I don't get any stacks deeper than 10 on that capture file.
Oops - that should be bug 4951. I get 162 on that one. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
