Thierry Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> As I wrote in some of my mails, I work on a project which made me to use 
> the epan as a dissecting library, independently from the rest of the 
> wireshark source.
> 
> I have some troubles with memory handling. I have huge memory leaks when 
> I decode multicast streams (because there are lots of packets to dissect 
> of course :) ).
> 
> This kind of use isn't common, nor documented, so I must have made some 
> errors in my implementation or even in the structure of my wrappers.
> 
> So I have some questions to the wireshark gurus :
> 
> Do you see some reason, for example in my code, that could cause such 
> memory leaks ?
> 
> I have supposed that the whole memory used to build the proto_tree 
> wasn't free'd when I called proto_tree_free, do you free its content by 
> another way ?
> 
> Is there a way to force dissectors and the rest of Wireshark code to 
> release this memory ?

The valgrind output shows that Valgrind thinks the ep_ and se_ allocated 
memory is being leaked.  Sounds like you need to call ep_free_all() 
(after each packet) and se_free_all() (when the file is closed).

Normally the former is done in epan_dissect_run() and the latter is done 
in cleanup_dissection() (or init_dissection()).  Not sure how that 
relates to your code.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to