On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Sake Blok <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 okt 2010, at 20:35, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Sake Blok <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could you please open a bug report at http://bugs.wireshark.org and > attach the two tracefiles so that we don't lose track of it? > > > > Done, bugzilla entry #5269 submitted. > > > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 > > Thanks, this will prevent it from being forgotten. > > I just checked in a partial fix. Now the packets in your trace are indeed > decoded, however, there are still some problems with the dissection, so I > will leave the bug open until that is fixed too. >
I looked at the src for that dissector, and I found that the enumerations for the bit mask for the flags field were all 'off-by-one' and that the endian-ess macro was there and used in numerous places. By shifting the mask enumerations, I got the dissector to work, but I didn't check the details. Fulko
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
