Eloy No problem.
I removed the .la file and the dissector still seams to work just fine. I am going to deploy it without the .la file. Unless somebody else says differently. Thanks, Brian On 10/5/2010 2:04 PM, Eloy Paris wrote: > On 10/05/2010 01:57 PM, Eloy Paris wrote: > > [...] > >> Current Wireshark 1.4.x packages in the Debian experimental distribution >> do not ship the .la files, and I verified that I can build Network >> Expect, an external application that uses libwireshark services, just >> fine against the respective -dev packages. >> >> So long story short, yes, the .so is the only thing someone would need, >> but if you find otherwise I'd love to hear about it. > Whoops, sorry for replying to myself but I just realized that you're > talking about a plugin, which is something that perhaps is "loaded via > libltdl in a way that requires that meta-information [in the .la file]". > In that case the .la is needed. I guess the best thing to do would be to > test if things work without the .la file... > > Cheers, > > Eloy Paris.- > netexpect.org > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
