Ok, Go sit in the penalty box for 20 CPU cycles.
;) Jaap On 10/20/2010 07:57 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > Yeah but I feel stupid because I actually found and fixed that bug in my > local ipfix.c afterwards, and didn't go fix it in the bug-database entry. :( > -hadriel > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Meier wrote: > >> Hadriel Kaplan wrote: >>> Ugh - my patch submitted as bug 5242 caused it. Sorry bout that. >>> I didn't realize the bug was taken in yet (I had added myself to >>> its cc list, but never got an email). >>> >>> -hadriel >>> >> >> Not a problem: >> >> It turns out that the addition of ipfix.c to wiretap exposed a bug in >> another wiretap reader (ascendtext.c) >> as well as the bug in ipfix.c that Jeff identified. >> >> (ascendtext.c wasn't properly initializing *err before using it thus >> depending on whatever value *err had from previously invoked wiretap >> readers). >> >> I'll be committing fixes shortly. >> >> Bill >> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
