Le 16/11/2010 21:13, Helge Kruse a écrit : > Am 16.11.2010 19:05, schrieb Stephen Fisher: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:37:32PM +0100, Helge Kruse wrote: >>> Is it guaranteed that a 1.2.x plugin runs with Wireshark 1.4.x? >> Jaap and Joerg are referring to the same stable branch, so any newer >> version of 1.2.x than the one you compiled with (or newer 1.4.x than the >> one you compiled it with). This makes sense because only important bug >> fixes are moved from the development back into the newer stable branches >> and no new features. I just didn't think we were verifying that bug >> fixes never broke the ABI, although I can see why they never or at least >> rarely would. > Ok, I understand that life cycle. But I cannot convince anybody to > update there 1.2.x installations to 1.4.x. > > So I must now decide if I have to provide a DLL compile with the 1.2.x > header and libs and an additional DLL compiled with the 1.4.x header and > libs. I don't think about the development branches (1.3.x). Seems better. I know at least 1 modification : - stats_tree_register prototype changed But it could have many other modifications which are not visible by the compiler. On function prototype or struct definitions ...
> Sorry, if this additional question is annoying. But unfortunately I did > not get the answer from your mail. I'm sure this would be my fault. > > Helge > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list<[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > > -- Wireshark Generic Dissector http://wsgd.free.fr ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
