On Dec 15, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Chris Maynard wrote:
> Guy Harris <g...@...> writes:
>
>> SHOULD in some RFC - or even a MUST - but I don't know offhand what RFC that
>> is)
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
Sorry, I didn't make it clear that "what RFC that is" is "what RFC - if any -
says that ephemeral ports should be handed out by default", not "what RFC
explains what SHOULD and MUST mean". *Is* there an RFC that describes
well-known, registered, and ephemeral ports? The first two of them are
mentioned in the IANA port number assignment list:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
but that doesn't mention ephemeral ports.___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
