On 12/18/2010 06:13 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:53:09PM -0500, Bill Meier wrote: >> It seemed like a good idea to me. I find trying to read >> README.developer rather tedious, altho I do agree that a plain text file >> can be grep'ed and etc. >> >> If there's feeling that README.developer should be left as is, then I >> can certainly revert the changes. > > If someone is willing and able to create a readable ascii version from the > docbook (as proposed in another mail to this thread), then docbook > integration would be my preferred solution as it provides one source where > to search for programming information. Right now I use wsdg rarely because > of its format.
+1. I never use the wsdg. I used it once or twice for the how-to-set-up-a-win32-build instructions and I looked at it a couple of times after that when reviewing patches against it. I use README.developer on a fairly regular basis. :e doc/R<tab>dev<tab><enter>/whatever-I'm-looking-for (optionally followed by a bunch of "n"s) gets me what I want pretty quickly. I can even then cut-n-paste a sample function call (for example) into whatever file I'm editing, all without touching the mouse. I wouldn't mind too much if the text-only version was generated, though it might make it slightly less likely that I'd edit it. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
