bernoulli wrote:
>> Is the bug still there (that is, is it really LOST)?
>>
>> What's the bug number?  Is review_for_checkin set to "?" on the patch?
>>
>> If so, it's probably just that no one has had time to look at it.
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> thank you for your reply. The bug number is 5498, so it's not really 
> lost. Yes, review_for_checkin is set to "?".
> So if I have done everything correct it's all ok. You know, I don't know 
> the typical response
> times the core developers need for a patch right now - the developers 
> guide said "within a few days".

You're right, it does.  That's often a bit optimistic (take a look at 
the "request queue" in the bug database).  I updated the documentation's 
suggestions in rev 35233.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to