Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Guy Harris ([email protected]):
> > 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual
> > data.
> > I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just
> > part
> > of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch).
> > This is the approach used by packet-radiotap.c
> At this point, I prefer the second approach. The Linux USB dissector
> now uses that, as of revision 32534; switching to that cleaned things
> up.
thanks for the feedback. I'll define the pseudo-header for DVB-CI, apply
for a DLT and modify my dissector accordingly.
Best regards,
Martin
~
~
~
~
~
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
