On Mar 12, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > I obviously didn't encounter that problem on my 32-bit system. Your > workaround will do for now, but as we now have data types (time) that will put > additional stuff instead of only TRUE/FALSE into this call, I wanted to > create a generic solution. What's the "correct" solution to this? Use > a union?
Add a new member to the ext_value_string structure, containing a guint giving the encoding value to pass to the specialfunction, rather than overloading evs? Unfortunately, in standard C89, you can't initialize unions arbitrarily. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
