On 3/17/11 10:16 AM, Chris Maynard wrote: > We The People <please.nospam08@...> writes: > >> Reference: >> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChIntroPlatforms.html >> Win-ME: >> "The last known version to work (with Win-ME) was Ethereal 0.99.0 >> (which includes WinPcap 3.1)" > > That might be misleading. While it does say that the last known version to > work > with Win-ME was Ethereal 0.99.0, it does not say that Ethereal 0.99.0 IS the > last version to work with Win-ME. > > The Wireshark 0.99.2 release notes still mentions ME: > http://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-0.99.2.html, so it may very > well work on Win-ME too. One thing is certain, Wireshark 0.99.5 will not work > with Win-ME, but 0.99.4, 0.99.3 and 0.99.2 all might. > > So, you might try Wireshark 0.99.4, 0.99.3 or 0.99.2 and see if one of those > work for you. If one of them does, you can report it back to us so the > Wireshark user's guide can be updated to mention it as the new, "last known > version" to work on Win-ME.
Even Ethereal 0.99.0 may not work: http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200604/msg00295.html We added memory protection and guard pages via VirtualAlloc + VirtualProtect in 0.99.0. According to MSDN those calls are only supported on Windows 2000 and later. The last release without memory protection was Ethereal 0.10.14: http://www.ethereal.com/distribution/win32/all-versions/ Keep in mind that it's in the "older than dirt" phase of it's product lifecycle. -- Join us for Sharkfest ’11! · Wireshark® Developer and User Conference Stanford University, June 13-16 · http://sharkfest.wireshark.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
