On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 7:14 AM, Anders Broman wrote: > >> Unfortunatly there is no telling when it will be reviewed though - someone >> will have to find the time to do it. > > I've reviewed it - and already have a version with most of the suggestions > from the review, which appears to work, although I don't know what the right > thing to do is for the "unknown message type" issue. I'm waiting for > Roland's comments on that....
I have commented that in the bug section. Basically there is no unknown message type, so if the dissector encounters such a type, it will fail the dissection, and the dissector will return false, allowing another dissector a run at the packet. I have updated the bug report with the newest version of the patch. kind regards, Roland ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
