George Nychis wrote:
BTW, it appears that this has come up before in the past (2009):
https://$1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html
<http://1.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200910/msg00123.html>
but it doesn't seem like a resolution was made.. but this post has a
short-term workaround:
http://seclists.org/wireshark/2009/Oct/286
I am going to try this out, the original poster never got back with
whether this worked or not.
What version are you trying to cross-compile? I believe that the
changes discussed in that thread were eventually checked in with rev 30586.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
