Am 16.04.2011 10:23, schrieb Sake Blok: > On 16 apr 2011, at 09:40, Anders Broman wrote: >> First time I saw it - [Truncated] i found it a bit ambiguous perhaps it >> should say >> [Display Truncated] even if that's a bit longish. > > Or we should put the [truncated] at the end instead of the beginning? Than it > is also not to bad to make it longer, so we could even make it [truncated to > 240 bytes]. > > Sake > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
I think the way this is being done is quite good. For most cases I don't see the necessity to change this. I just wanted to clearly know about the meaning in a quite special and particular case. Recompiling with 0xFFFF helped to fully display the authorization header token. Greetings ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
