thank you, Chris, I will take a look at it
Thanks > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:48:13 +0000 > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] ask about dissector_add ( ) function to > instruct wireshark to pass packet to my dissector > > Changqin Xia <xiachangqin66@...> writes: > > > Hi, allI am a newbie on dissector development. I have a question about the > "dissector_add( )" function.I went through a few examples, most of them are > using "tcp.port" or "udp.port" or something like that.My dissector not uses > any > port number to instruct wireshark to pass packets to my dissector, my > dissector > is using "Magic" (the first byte). Any one can tell me if I use the magic > number to realize dissector_add( ) function, what should I do? any example? > any > other dissector in the same way? or Any part on the "README.developer" talking > about this?ThanksJohn > > The new name of the function is dissector_add_uint() and there are plenty of > examples where it's used to register a value in dissector tables other than > tcp.port or udp.port. One of MANY such examples can be found in packet-ip.c: > > dissector_add_uint("ethertype", ETHERTYPE_IP, ip_handle); > > If you're using Wireshark 1.6, you can view all the tables through "Internals > -> > Dissector tables". The string tables and integer tables are segregated. > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
