On 23/08/2011 21:55, Chris Maynard wrote: > Andreas <AndreasSander1@...> writes: > >> Am 23.08.2011 22:30, schrieb Chris Maynard: >>> Andreas<AndreasSander1@...> writes: >>> >>>> Yes, I tried. I need only libwireshark. That's why I reduced the make >>>> targets to build. But, alas, I get exactly the same result, when I >>>> "nmake all". >>> Can you verify that MSVC_VARIANT is set correctly in config.nmake? >> MSVC_VARIANT=MSVC2008 matches with my compiler. > Just to be sure, you might try another: > nmake distclean > nmake all > [fail] > nmake all (again) > > If you still don't progress any further and can live w/out zlib support > temporarily just so you can get on with the rest of your work, you could try > commenting out ZLIB_DIR in config.nmake. Also, you may want to recheck that > you > followed all steps in the developer's guide: > http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html > > One other thing that *might* be a problem (whether it's related or not, I > don't > know) is that you have python 2.7 installed and the notes in config.nmake > indicate the following: > > # NOTE: The Python library must have been compiled with the same > # compiler (MSVC_VARIANT) as Wireshark. Known python.org Python > # CRT versions: > # > # Python version CRT (32-bit) CRT (64-bit) > # 2.4.4 7.1 ? > # 2.6.1 9.0 ? > # 2.6.2 9.0 > > ... so this tells me you should probably be using 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. > Using the corresponding versions of Python and MSVC is only important when you are including the python interpreter support within Wireshark, i.e. PYTHON_EMBED is defined.
The reason for this, along with the reason for rebuilding zlib rather than using the pre-built DLL is that a process shouldn't use components (the exe and any DLL's or libraries) that use a different CRT as memory allocations are not transportable across CRT's. To ensure consistency we rebuild zlib as it isn't too hard to do, but is far to hard for the python interpreter. When just using Python as a build tool the version doesn't matter, although there was an issue reported yesterday when using Python 3.2. -- Regards, Graham Bloice ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
