On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Sandwood Sandwood wrote:

> The "Wireshark: Decode As"  functionality is very usefull in some case when 
> the carrying protocol does not provide a "upper protocol field".

For the Ethertype, MPLS label, IP protocol, TCP port, UDP port, and SCTP PPI 
pages, "Decode As" works by registering a particular value of the "upper 
protocol field" in the carrying protocol's dissector table to use the upper 
protocol, so that requires an upper protocol field.

For DCE RPC, it works by registering a particular collection of port numbers, 
context IDs and (for DCE RPC over SMB) SMB file ID to use a particular DCE 
RPC-based protocol, so that applies *only* to DCE RPC-based protocols.

For ASN.1, it works only if the "capture file" is a raw collection of ASN.1 
BER-encoded data, and applies only to ASN.1 BER-encoded protocol.

I don't think we support writing dissectors either for DCE RPC-based protocols 
or ASN.1-based protocols in Lua, so you're presumably talking about dissectors 
for protocols running atop:

        protocols with an Ethertype, which have an "upper protocol field";

        IPv4 or IPv6, which have an "upper protocol field", the IP protocol 
type/next header field;

        TCP or UDP, which have a field that's technically not an "upper 
protocol field" but that can sometimes be used as one, the port number;

        SCTP, which has the PPI field;

and all have dissector tables for the fields in question.

> When writing a Dissector in LUA, the newly written dissector is not in the 
> List of protocols. 
> 
> So if  the carrying protocol does not offer a Dissector Table where I can add 
> the upper LUA protocol, how can we process ?

If the protocol on top of which your protocol runs doesn't have a dissector 
table, you can't even make a dissector written in C appear in the "Decode As" 
widget, except for DCE RPC-based and ASN.1-based protocols.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to