On 10/19/2011 7:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
FT_PROTOCOL Not yet fixed: Should be ???
ENC_NA. It's like FT_NONE.
Q: Does it make any sense for an entry in hf[] in a dissector to have a
field type of FT_PROTOCOL ? (e.g., packet-extreme.c)
I just noticed that there are a few cases like this.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
