On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Combs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release > over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down. > Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point? > > On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote: > > So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark. > Looking at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html he read the description > literally which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest development release. > So he figured it might be newer than the fresh 1.6.3 release... > > > > I think we can remove that old release candidate, or alternatively put a > daily/weekly tarball of trunk on that page. > > > Hi, Why not release a new dev release (based on trunk) to each new release of 1.6.x/1.4.x ? Regards, > ---> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic > > ----> http://cubic.org/~doj > > -----> http://llg.cubic.org > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
