On Nov 22, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Krishnamurthy Mayya wrote: > I have submitted a bug report ( in Bugzilla) regarding the extensions we have > done to wireshark to support MPLS-TP payload decoding. Actually, we have > submitted 3 different bugs which are interrelated as in the diff files > submitted will make sense only if applied to 3 files altogehter. (bug reports > 6607, 6608, 6609).
If it makes no sense to apply some but not all of the patches, they should have been submitted as *one* bug. If the patch for bug A makes a useful improvement by itself, the patch for bug B requires the patch for bug A and makes additional useful improvements, and the patch for bug C requires the patches for bugs A and B, then it's OK to submit them as separate bugs, but the bugs should specify the dependencies. > Will there be any problem?? And is there any way in which we will come to > know when our changes will be accepted?? When the bug's status is changed to RESOLVED/FIXED. You should mark patches for review. You may see the patch *rejected*, with comments as to why it was rejected, in which case you should submit a new patch with the problems resolved and mark it for review. > I would also like to know if the descriptions mentioned in the bug report can > be edited. The summary line can be edited. The initial description and subsequent comments cannot be; the most you can do is make a comment saying "when I said XXX I meant YYY". ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
